Friday, April 27, 2012
My primary source is a movie trailer about the Korean War and its effect on families, particularly the two siblings that are the main characters. I plan to use "Sources of Korean Culture: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century. Vol. 2." to expand on the ideals shown in the trailer, and "Mathematics in the South Korean Flag" to tie in the trailer title "Taegukgi" (the Korean flag) to the trailer as a whole, specifically why I think they chose that as the title. My third source is still up in the air, I have a couple of ideas but I'm trying them out in different ways so I'm not entirely sure what I'll ultimately choose. It will most likely be one of the many reviews on the movie, though.I think my secondary source integration will be mostly focusing on the title of the movie and its meaning. The trailer is too long to really analyse all the information given. It's hard to write ABOUT something I haven't finished completely, since every time I write it out, it comes out different than before.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
After reading your brief description, I'm still not sure what's your specific focus in your primary source. Which kinds of effects on that familities, the political attitudes,the economics or the education? I know you must have specific idea. So I just recommend that you can be more specific in analyzing your sources. It seems too broad to cover your topic.
ReplyDeleteLe Zhang
I think it might be a good way to make a comparison of all your sources before coming up with your own standpoint. You can integrate different views and dicide what you want to analyze deeply on. That is a way to aviod bias.
ReplyDelete